Why Major Automakers Are Returning to Physical Controls in Vehicle Dashboards
📷 Image source: slashgear.com
The Touchscreen Revolution Meets Reality
How digital dashboards dominated automotive design
For over a decade, automotive interiors have undergone a dramatic transformation as manufacturers raced to replace physical buttons and knobs with sleek touchscreen interfaces. These glossy displays promised a futuristic driving experience while allowing automakers to streamline production and reduce component costs. From luxury sedans to economy models, touchscreens became the centerpiece of cabin design, often controlling everything from climate settings to entertainment systems.
According to slashgear.com's October 16, 2025 report, this trend is now reversing as several major automakers acknowledge significant drawbacks in touchscreen-dominated interiors. The publication notes that companies including Mazda, Toyota, and Volkswagen are actively reintroducing physical controls in their latest models after receiving extensive customer feedback about safety and usability concerns. This shift represents one of the most significant design reversals in recent automotive history, challenging the industry's assumption that digital interfaces always represent progress.
The Safety Concerns Driving Change
Why touchscreens create dangerous distractions
Research conducted by various automotive safety organizations has demonstrated that operating touchscreen interfaces requires significantly more visual attention and cognitive effort than using physical controls. Drivers must look away from the road to locate and press virtual buttons, creating what safety experts call 'visual distraction time' that increases accident risk. This problem becomes particularly acute when adjusting critical functions like climate control or defrost settings during adverse weather conditions.
Mazda's engineering team explicitly cited safety concerns when explaining their decision to remove the touchscreen functionality from their latest infotainment systems, according to slashgear.com. The company determined that physical controls allow for muscle memory development, enabling drivers to operate functions without taking their eyes off the road. This approach aligns with growing evidence that tactile feedback significantly reduces distraction compared to flat, unresponsive touch surfaces that provide no physical confirmation of input.
User Experience Complaints Mount
How driver frustration forced automakers to listen
Beyond safety issues, automotive manufacturers have faced mounting criticism about the practical usability of touchscreen-dominated interfaces. Common complaints include the need for multiple menu navigations to perform simple tasks, fingerprint-smudged screens that become difficult to read in sunlight, and laggy response times that frustrate users. Many drivers reported that basic functions like adjusting volume or changing temperature settings became unnecessarily complicated when buried in digital menus.
Customer satisfaction surveys across multiple brands consistently showed declining ratings for vehicles with minimal physical controls. According to slashgear.com, Volkswagen specifically acknowledged that customer feedback directly influenced their decision to bring back physical volume knobs and climate control buttons in upcoming models. This user-centered approach marks a significant shift from the previous strategy of pushing technology for technology's sake, recognizing that driver preferences should ultimately guide interface design decisions.
Mazda's Strategic Pivot
How one automaker is leading the return to physical controls
Mazda has emerged as one of the most vocal proponents of the physical control movement, completely disabling touchscreen functionality in their latest models while the vehicle is in motion. The Japanese automaker has implemented a rotary controller positioned between the front seats that allows drivers to navigate infotainment systems without reaching toward the dashboard. This approach maintains access to digital features while eliminating the need for drivers to lean forward and interact directly with the screen during operation.
The company's human-machine interface engineers conducted extensive research showing that their Commander Control system reduces driver distraction by keeping hands in a more natural position and providing tactile feedback. According to slashgear.com, Mazda believes this hybrid approach—combining limited physical controls with strategic screen use—represents the optimal balance between functionality and safety. Their implementation demonstrates that the shift away from touchscreens doesn't mean abandoning digital technology entirely, but rather integrating it more thoughtfully into the driving experience.
Toyota's Practical Approach
How the world's largest automaker is simplifying interfaces
Toyota has taken a similarly pragmatic approach by reintroducing physical buttons for climate control and audio functions in several recent models, including updates to the Camry and Corolla. The company's chief engineer acknowledged that customer feedback about the frustration of using touchscreen-only controls directly influenced these design changes. Toyota's solution maintains a central display for navigation and entertainment while ensuring that frequently used functions remain accessible through physical interfaces.
This balanced approach reflects Toyota's reputation for practical, user-friendly design that prioritizes functionality over flashy technology. According to slashgear.com, the automaker conducted extensive usability testing that confirmed drivers could operate physical controls more quickly and with less frustration than touchscreen equivalents. The company's decision carries significant weight in the industry given Toyota's position as the world's largest automaker and its influence on broader industry trends.
Volkswagen's Course Correction
Learning from the ID series feedback
Volkswagen's experience with its ID electric vehicle series provided a particularly compelling case study in touchscreen limitations. Early models drew criticism for over-reliance on touch-sensitive controls even for basic functions like climate adjustment and volume control. The German automaker initially embraced minimalist interior design as part of its electric vehicle identity, but customer response prompted a rapid reevaluation of this strategy.
According to slashgear.com, Volkswagen has announced that future models will feature physical buttons for critical functions, marking a significant reversal from their previous direction. The company's CEO publicly acknowledged that removing physical controls was a mistake that compromised usability. This candid admission from a major automaker signals broader industry recognition that driver experience should take precedence over design minimalism, especially for functions that require frequent adjustment while driving.
The Economics of Control Systems
How physical and digital interfaces compare in cost
The financial implications of control system design represent a complex calculation for automakers. While touchscreens initially appeared to offer cost savings through reduced component counts and simplified manufacturing, the reality has proven more complicated. High-quality touchscreens with responsive interfaces and sufficient processing power represent significant expenses, particularly as consumers expect larger, higher-resolution displays with each new model year.
Physical controls, while requiring more individual components, often prove more durable and reliable over a vehicle's lifespan. According to slashgear.com, warranty data from multiple manufacturers showed higher failure rates for touchscreen systems compared to traditional buttons and knobs. This reliability factor, combined with reduced customer complaints and potentially higher satisfaction ratings, may offset the marginally higher component costs of physical controls when viewed from a total ownership perspective.
Global Regulatory Considerations
How safety standards may influence interface design
While no major market has yet implemented specific regulations limiting touchscreen use in vehicles, safety agencies in Europe and North America have begun examining the distraction implications of digital interfaces. The European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) has announced plans to introduce testing protocols that evaluate driver distraction caused by infotainment systems, potentially creating incentives for manufacturers to implement less distracting control interfaces.
These developments suggest that regulatory pressure may soon complement market forces in pushing automakers toward safer interface designs. According to slashgear.com, automotive safety advocates have increasingly voiced concerns about the distraction potential of complex touchscreen systems, particularly those that integrate non-essential functions like social media and video streaming. While the timeline for potential regulations remains uncertain, the direction clearly points toward greater scrutiny of how interface design impacts driver attention.
The Luxury Segment Exception
Why high-end vehicles continue embracing screens
Despite the trend toward physical controls in mainstream vehicles, the luxury segment continues to feature increasingly sophisticated touchscreen interfaces. Brands like Mercedes-Benz, BMW, and Audi have introduced massive curved displays that span entire dashboards, arguing that their advanced voice control systems and passenger-only operation modes mitigate safety concerns. These manufacturers position extensive digital interfaces as premium features that differentiate their products from mass-market alternatives.
This divergence suggests the automotive industry may be developing a bifurcated approach to interface design, with luxury brands emphasizing technological sophistication while mainstream manufacturers prioritize usability and safety. According to slashgear.com, luxury automakers have invested heavily in developing more intuitive voice control systems that theoretically reduce the need for manual screen interaction. However, the effectiveness of these systems in eliminating distraction remains debated among human-machine interface experts.
The Future of Vehicle Interfaces
Where automotive interior design is headed
The movement away from touchscreen dominance doesn't signal a complete return to analog controls but rather points toward more thoughtful integration of multiple interface modalities. Industry experts predict that future vehicles will combine physical controls for frequently used functions with digital interfaces for less urgent tasks, augmented by increasingly sophisticated voice control systems. This multi-modal approach acknowledges that different situations call for different interaction methods.
According to slashgear.com, several automakers are developing context-aware systems that adjust interface availability based on driving conditions, potentially limiting complex functions during high-demand situations. The ideal future interface likely combines the immediate tactile feedback of physical controls, the flexibility of digital displays, and the hands-free operation of voice commands—all working in concert to minimize distraction while maintaining functionality. This evolution represents a more mature approach to automotive technology that prioritizes driver experience over technological novelty.
Consumer Response and Market Impact
How buyers are reacting to the control shift
Early indications suggest that consumers are responding positively to the reintroduction of physical controls in new vehicles. Reviewers and early adopters have praised models that balance digital and physical interfaces, particularly when manufacturers implement well-designed control knobs and buttons that provide satisfying tactile feedback. This response challenges the previously held assumption that car buyers universally prefer high-tech digital interfaces over traditional controls.
According to slashgear.com, automotive journalists have noted that vehicles with thoughtful physical control implementation often receive higher ratings for interior usability despite having less visually dramatic interiors. This market feedback creates a virtuous cycle where positive reception encourages more manufacturers to reconsider their approach to interface design. The commercial success of models that have embraced this balanced approach will likely determine how quickly and extensively the industry shifts away from touchscreen-dominated cabins.
Perspektif Pembaca
Share your experience with vehicle controls
What has been your experience with touchscreen versus physical controls in vehicles? Do you find yourself frustrated by complex digital menus when you simply want to adjust the temperature or change radio stations? Have you encountered situations where touchscreen interfaces felt unsafe or distracting while driving?
Alternatively, if you prefer touchscreen interfaces, what advantages do you find in digital controls compared to physical buttons and knobs? How do you navigate the safety concerns associated with operating touchscreens while driving? Your perspective on this evolving aspect of vehicle design can provide valuable insights into how automakers might better balance technology with practicality in future models.
#AutomotiveSafety #VehicleDesign #PhysicalControls #TouchscreenIssues #CarInteriors
